To United States Trademark Law Overview (Resets All Frames)
Return to Tarnishment of Marks Page
HASBRO, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD., et al., Defendants.
NO. C96-130WD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
February 9, 1996, Decided
February 9, 1996, FILED
COUNSEL:
For HASBRO INC., a Rhode Island Corporation, plaintiff: Jill Diane Bowman, STOEL, RIVES, BOLEY, JONES & GREY, , WA. Lisa G. Meckfessel, Kenneth G. Wilson, Kenneth B. Wilson, WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI, PALO ALTO, CA.
For INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LTD, a corporation, INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., defendants: John D. Lowery, GRAHAM & JAMES LLP/RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S., , WA.
For INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LTD., INTERNET ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., counter-claimants: John D. Lowery, GRAHAM & JAMES LLP/RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S., , WA.
For HASBRO INC., counter-defendant: Jill Diane Bowman, STOEL, RIVES, BOLEY, JONES & GREY, , WA. Lisa G. Meckfessel, Kenneth G. Wilson, Kenneth B. Wilson, WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI, PALO ALTO, CA.
William L. Dwyer, United States District Judge
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
On February 5, 1996, the application of plaintiff Hasbro, Inc. ("Hasbro") for a temporary restraining order came on for hearing by the court. Plaintiff appeared through Kenneth B. Wilson and Lisa G. Meckfessel of the law firm of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, and Jill D. Bowman of the law of Stoel Rives LLP. Defendants Internet Entertainment Group, Ltd., Brian Cartmell and Internet Entertainment Group, Inc. appeared through John D. Lowery and E. Russell Tarleton of the law of Graham & James LLP/Riddell Williams P.S. After the oral decision was announced, the parties agreed that the ruling should be entered on a preliminary injunction rather than merely as a temporary restraining order.
Having considered all papers submitted in support of said motion and in opposition thereto, and having heard oral argument in open court, the court finds that:
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hasbro's motion for preliminary injunction is granted. Defendants Internet Entertainment Group, Ltd., Brian Cartmell, and Internet Entertainment Group, Inc., and their officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert and participation with defendants who receive actual notice of this preliminary injunction, are enjoined from directly or indirectly using the name CANDYLAND or the Internet domain name "candyland.com," or any similar name which is likely to dilute the value of Hasbro's CANDYLAND mark, in connection with the advertising, operation or maintenance of any Internet site, including but not limited to any Internet site containing sexually explicit material or other pornographic content. Defendants are directed to immediately make active efforts to stop, cancel or discontinue any previously purchased advertising which refers to the name CANDY LAND or the Internet domain name "candyland.com."
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall immediately remove all content from the "candyland.com" site. However, defendants shall be allowed to post a "referral notice" at the URL address "http:/www.candyland.com" until May 5, 1996, which shall provide the new location of defendants' Internet site. The referral notice shall not contain any hyperlink to defendants' new site or sites, or to any other site. After the expiration of the 90 day referral period, defendants must remove the referral notice and thereafter discontinue any use, either direct or indirect, of the name domain name "candyland.com."
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hasbro shall not be required to post a bond pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) in connection with this preliminary injunction, as defendants expressly waived any bond requirement relating to this order at the preliminary injunction hearing.
The clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record.
Dated: February 9, 1996.
William L. Dwyer
United States District Judge
Nothing in this site is intended in any way to constitute legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. The author, Jay M. Tyndall, shall not be liable for any damages of any type, whether actual or consequential, which may arise from the use or reliance of any reader on the content of this site or any site to which it links. No guarantee or assurance is made that any information transmitted to or via any unsecure portion of this site will remain confidential.